Poor
treatment of workers in Chinese factories which make Apple products has been
discovered by an undercover BBC Panorama investigation.
It
found standards on workers' hours, ID cards, dormitories, work meetings and
juvenile workers were being breached at the Pegatron factories.
Apple
said it strongly disagreed with the programme's conclusions.
Exhausted
workers were filmed falling asleep on their 12-hour shifts at the Pegatron
factories on the outskirts of Shanghai.
One
undercover reporter, working in a factory making parts for Apple computers, had
to
work 18 days in a row despite repeated requests for a day off.
Another
reporter, whose longest shift was 16 hours, said: "Every time I got back
to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move.
"Even
if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and
rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."
'Continuous improvement'
Apple
declined to be interviewed for the programme, but said in a statement: "We
are aware of no other company doing as much as Apple to ensure fair and safe
working conditions.
"We
work with suppliers to address shortfalls, and we see continuous and
significant improvement, but we know our work is never done."
Apple
said it was a very common practice for workers to nap during breaks, but it
would investigate any evidence they were falling asleep while working.
It
said it monitored the working hours of more than a million workers and that
staff at Pegatron were averaging 55 hours a week.
The
poor conditions in Chinese factories were highlighted in 2010 when 14 workers
killed themselves at Apple's biggest supplier, Foxconn.
Following
the suicides, Apple published a set of standards spelling out how factory
workers should be treated. It also moved some of its production work to
Pegatron's factories on the outskirts of Shanghai.
But
Panorama's undercover reporters found that these standards were routinely
breached on the factory floor.
Overtime
is supposed to be voluntary, but none of the reporters were offered any choice.
In addition to the excessive hours, one reporter had to attend unpaid meetings
before and after work. Another reporter was housed in a dormitory where 12
workers shared a cramped room.
Apple
says the dormitory overcrowding has now been resolved and that it requires
suppliers to retroactively pay workers if it finds they haven't been paid for
work meetings.
Pegatron
said it was carefully investigating Panorama's claims and would take all
necessary action if any deficiencies were found at their facilities.
"Worker
safety and well-being are our top priorities. We set very high standards,
conduct rigorous training for managers and workers, and have external auditors
regularly visiting our facilities to find areas for improvement," a
statement said.
Dangerous conditions
Panorama
also travelled further down Apple's supply chain to the Indonesian island of
Bangka.
Apple
says it is dedicated to the ethical sourcing of minerals, but the programme
found evidence that tin from illegal mines could be entering its supply chain.
It
found children digging tin ore out by hand in extremely dangerous conditions -
miners can be buried alive when the walls of sand or mud collapse.
Twelve-year-old
Rianto was working with his dad at the bottom of a 70-foot cliff of sand. He
said: "I worry about landslides. The earth slipping from up there to the
bottom. It could happen."
Panorama
tracked down a gang who collect tin from the area where Rianto was working. One
of them said they sold tin to a smelter on Apple's list of suppliers.
Johan
Murod, who runs one of the smelters on Apple's list, said 70% of the tin that
is exported comes from the small-scale mines.
"At
the smelter there's everything from both large and small scale mines. It's all
mixed. There's no way to know what is legal and what is illegal."
Apple
says it is a complex situation on Bangka with tens of thousands of miners
selling tin through many middle men.
"The
simplest course of action would be for Apple to unilaterally refuse any tin
from Indonesian mines. That would be easy for us to do and would certainly
shield us from criticism.
"But
that would also be the lazy and cowardly path, since it would do nothing to
improve the situation. We have chosen to stay engaged and attempt to drive
changes on the ground."
BBC
Business
No comments:
Post a Comment